New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[dev.icinga.com #8612] IDO performance is far from where it used to be #1428
Comments
Updated by tgelf on 2015-03-05 15:02:16 +00:00
|
Updated by tgelf on 2015-03-05 15:16:06 +00:00
|
Updated by tgelf on 2015-03-05 15:18:44 +00:00
|
Updated by tgelf on 2015-03-05 15:28:29 +00:00
|
Updated by elippmann on 2015-07-14 10:33:10 +00:00
|
Updated by elippmann on 2015-07-14 10:33:14 +00:00
|
Updated by elippmann on 2015-07-14 10:34:12 +00:00
|
Updated by jmeyer on 2015-07-29 10:18:53 +00:00
|
Updated by elippmann on 2015-08-04 10:54:58 +00:00
|
Updated by frjaraur on 2015-08-28 10:20:06 +00:00 We have poor performance on icingaweb2 and we caught some very slow queries that are used quite often. Why don't we use some views for message counts instead of refreshing data continously?. We have seen that mysql sessions stayed opened for long time waiting for that queries to stop. We had to update max_sessions from 50 (mysql default) to 200 but that wasn't the real problem because sessions inceasse everytime a long query appears slowing down icinga2, until we restart mysql server and sessions are freed.
Is it possible to used table views to speed up enviroment? Javier R. |
Updated by elippmann on 2015-10-01 21:12:25 +00:00
|
Updated by elippmann on 2015-11-20 13:10:52 +00:00
|
Updated by deneu on 2015-12-11 14:37:38 +00:00 Anything new to this or is this solved in any kind of release? |
Updated by elippmann on 2016-02-16 10:54:53 +00:00
|
Updated by Tux12Fun on 2016-03-09 15:30:48 +00:00 I can also notice a performance decrease with icinga2/icingaweb2. My MySQL is flooding slow-query log because of lots of temp tables and full table scans. |
Updated by elippmann on 2016-03-09 15:40:44 +00:00 Hi, From which version did you upgrade? I'm not quite sure whether we changed any of the queries recently. Best regards, |
Updated by mnardin on 2016-03-11 11:38:57 +00:00 Hi,
I don't know if the configuration on our end is the cause for this performance. This is our my.cnf:
Best regards |
Updated by elippmann on 2016-10-05 11:24:40 +00:00
|
Updated by elippmann on 2016-10-05 11:24:52 +00:00
Closed in favor of #12732. |
This issue has been migrated from Redmine: https://dev.icinga.com/issues/8612
Created by tgelf on 2015-03-05 14:55:30 +00:00
Assignee: (none)
Status: Closed (closed on 2016-10-05 11:24:52 +00:00)
Target Version: (none)
Last Update: 2016-10-05 11:24:52 +00:00 (in Redmine)
While we are A LOT faster than legacy frontends I'm very unhappy with the current performance. We used to be WAY faster than we are now, especially in environments with thousands of objects. We should try to figure out the worst bottlenecks, link them to this issue and try to fix them one by one.
Cheers,
Thomas
Subtasks:
Relations:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: