Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 15, 2019. It is now read-only.

[dev.icinga.com #3886] Inconsistent ordering definition in templates #1062

Closed
icinga-migration opened this issue Mar 21, 2013 · 3 comments
Closed
Milestone

Comments

@icinga-migration
Copy link

This issue has been migrated from Redmine: https://dev.icinga.com/issues/3886

Created by jmosshammer on 2013-03-21 16:05:18 +00:00

Assignee: jmosshammer
Status: Resolved (closed on 2013-03-25 13:53:42 +00:00)
Target Version: 1.8.3
Last Update: 2013-03-25 13:53:42 +00:00 (in Redmine)

Icinga Version: 1.8.3
Icinga Web Version: 1.8.3-pre
IDO Version: 1.8.3
OS Version: Any OS
DB Type: UNKNOWN
DB Version: *
Browser Version: *

The templates currently use order (the old format) and direction (the new one). It would be best to migrate all templates to use direction, but a little bit of backwards compatibility would be nice, too.

Changesets

2013-03-21 16:06:53 +00:00 by jmosshammer 35faabe

Fix order/direction being both usable for order direction

We must decide on a valid value, but to allow old templates to be used
without changes, direction is now used when order is not able.

fixes #3886

2013-03-25 13:28:18 +00:00 by jmosshammer 28bc5d6

Fix order/direction being both usable for order direction

We must decide on a valid value, but to allow old templates to be used
without changes, direction is now used when order is not able.

fixes #3886

Relations:

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by jmosshammer on 2013-03-22 05:50:34 +00:00

  • Status changed from New to Resolved
  • Done % changed from 0 to 100

Applied in changeset 35faabe.

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by mfrosch on 2013-03-22 07:34:25 +00:00

  • Status changed from Resolved to 7
  • Target Version changed from 1.8.4 to 1.8.3
  • Icinga Web Version changed from 1 to 1

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by jmosshammer on 2013-03-25 13:53:42 +00:00

  • Status changed from 7 to Resolved

Applied in changeset 28bc5d6.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant