Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[dev.icinga.com #9183] Add timestamp support for OpenTsdbWriter #2969

Closed
icinga-migration opened this issue Apr 27, 2015 · 9 comments
Closed
Labels
area/metrics General metrics handling enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@icinga-migration
Copy link

This issue has been migrated from Redmine: https://dev.icinga.com/issues/9183

Created by mfriedrich on 2015-04-27 09:21:10 +00:00

Assignee: tobiasvdk
Status: Resolved (closed on 2015-09-16 08:55:04 +00:00)
Target Version: 2.3.11
Last Update: 2015-10-13 09:59:22 +00:00 (in Redmine)

Backport?: Already backported
Include in Changelog: 1

Similar to GraphiteWriter in #8374 supporting the actual timestamp provided by the check result.

Changesets

2015-09-15 05:56:33 +00:00 by (unknown) 6ef7fc0

Add timestamp support for OpenTSDB

refs #9183

2015-09-15 13:37:15 +00:00 by (unknown) da8613a

Add timestamp support for OpenTSDB

fixes #9183

2015-10-13 09:59:07 +00:00 by (unknown) 8b80814

Add timestamp support for OpenTSDB

fixes #9183

Relations:

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by mfriedrich on 2015-04-27 09:21:17 +00:00

  • Relates set to 8374

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by mfriedrich on 2015-04-27 09:21:34 +00:00

  • Relates set to 9055

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by mfriedrich on 2015-09-05 15:10:52 +00:00

Any updates?

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by tobiasvdk on 2015-09-09 14:19:43 +00:00

I had no time the last months... but had a first look yesterday and will test my patch this week.

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by Anonymous on 2015-09-16 08:55:04 +00:00

  • Status changed from Assigned to Resolved
  • Done % changed from 0 to 100

Applied in changeset da8613a.

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by mfriedrich on 2015-09-16 09:13:06 +00:00

  • Target Version set to 2.4.0

Please leave those commits inside the feature branch in the future, and update the issue in order getting it reviewed. Thanks.

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by mfriedrich on 2015-09-25 12:47:09 +00:00

Is this something we may consider for back porting into 2.3.x?

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by tobiasvdk on 2015-09-28 12:15:17 +00:00

dnsmichi wrote:

Is this something we may consider for back porting into 2.3.x?
Yes, I can back port this to 2.3.

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by gbeutner on 2015-10-13 09:59:22 +00:00

  • Target Version changed from 2.4.0 to 2.3.11
  • Backport? changed from TBD to Yes

@icinga-migration icinga-migration added enhancement New feature or request area/metrics General metrics handling labels Jan 17, 2017
@icinga-migration icinga-migration added this to the 2.3.11 milestone Jan 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/metrics General metrics handling enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant