[dev.icinga.com #1508] counting for services in tac header is wrong #628
Comments
Updated by ricardo on 2011-05-12 22:51:54 +00:00
counting should be fine by now, except services total will be off when you have pending services on down hosts. |
Updated by mjbrooks on 2011-05-13 01:10:08 +00:00 I'm pulling in your branch to look at now. But from the looks of the demo system you get a +1 Excellent ;) |
Updated by mjbrooks on 2011-05-13 04:33:23 +00:00 A cfg option to not have the pending tags displayed would be nice. They are of limited use in day to day operations for most people. Just a thought. Great work BTW! |
Updated by mjbrooks on 2011-05-16 10:52:06 +00:00 I believe I have the fixes for your 8bc8772 commit, but your branch is tainted by an unrelated change so I'm not sure what the preferred way is of pushing my change to the git server is since now that you're deviated from master. |
Updated by mjbrooks on 2011-05-17 12:25:22 +00:00 Ricardo and I both seem to feel that these commits correct the counting. Can someone halfway decent at math also confirm? ;) |
Updated by mjbrooks on 2011-05-20 06:00:34 +00:00
Changing target now that we have a new one to set |
Updated by mfriedrich on 2011-05-23 17:07:14 +00:00 the unknown count is still buggy, but already told ricardo. |
Updated by mfriedrich on 2011-06-07 14:36:56 +00:00
|
Updated by mfriedrich on 2014-12-08 09:42:14 +00:00
|
This issue has been migrated from Redmine: https://dev.icinga.com/issues/1508
Created by ricardo on 2011-05-12 11:07:47 +00:00
Assignee: ricardo
Status: Resolved (closed on 2011-06-07 14:36:56 +00:00)
Target Version: 1.4.1
Last Update: 2014-12-08 09:42:14 +00:00 (in Redmine)
the problem here is that also problems from hosts which are down/unreachable are also get counted.
Changesets
2011-05-12 22:40:31 +00:00 by ricardo 8bc8772
2011-05-16 09:47:47 +00:00 by (unknown) 0126dd4
2011-05-19 18:58:56 +00:00 by ricardo 1ce1af3
2011-06-04 09:47:30 +00:00 by ricardo 6afa0b5
2011-06-04 09:47:56 +00:00 by (unknown) 62dd181
2011-06-04 09:49:15 +00:00 by ricardo 2c52754
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: