Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[dev.icinga.com #14019] No way to specify check period in latest Git #721

Closed
icinga-migration opened this issue Jan 16, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Comments

@icinga-migration
Copy link

This issue has been migrated from Redmine: https://dev.icinga.com/issues/14019

Created by greatexpectations on 2017-01-16 09:04:50 +00:00

Assignee: (none)
Status: Resolved (closed on 2017-01-16 09:49:04 +00:00)
Target Version: (none)
Last Update: 2017-01-16 09:49:04 +00:00 (in Redmine)


Hi,

while experimenting with today's git checkout from Director, I found that it is no longer possible to specify the check_period property for service templates. I really was hoping for improved support for that property instead (e.g. being able to override check_period for individual services without having to define a new service template)... :-)

before
before.PNG

after
after.PNG

Kind regards

Attachments

  • before.PNG greatexpectations - 2017-01-16 09:03:16 +00:00
  • after.PNG greatexpectations - 2017-01-16 09:03:21 +00:00
@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by tgelf on 2017-01-16 09:18:59 +00:00

  • Status changed from New to Feedback
  • Assigned to set to greatexpectations

Are you sure that any timeperiod has been defined? The field isn't shown unless there is such.

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by greatexpectations on 2017-01-16 09:25:33 +00:00

D'oh. You are right, of course... Thanks.

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by tgelf on 2017-01-16 09:49:04 +00:00

  • Tracker changed from Bug to Support
  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
  • Assigned to deleted greatexpectations

You're welcome!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant