You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Created by tobiasvdk on 2017-01-12 15:24:23 +00:00
Assignee: (none)
Status: Rejected (closed on 2017-01-13 08:04:52 +00:00)
Target Version: (none)
Last Update: 2017-01-13 08:04:52 +00:00 (in Redmine)
Mandatory fields, for a service, should be optional in the template and only mandatory in the resulting object. Otherwise you can't modify the service template anymore without assign a maybe stupid default.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This should already be the case?! If it isn't it is a bug, but I'm unable to reproduce this. Could you please show me a related example? Screen-shots would be great.
Updated by tobiasvdk on 2017-01-12 20:19:29 +00:00
tgelf wrote:
This should already be the case?! If it isn't it is a bug, but I'm unable to reproduce this. Could you please show me a related example? Screen-shots would be great.
Thanks
Thomas
You're right, it's already working as expected. You can reject the ticket. I actually made the mistake that I added the fields which are set in the service in the command (and not in the service template). In my case the array members of "nrpe_arguments". (Yes, we still use NRPE).
Thanks :-) There is nothing wrong with NRPE. Ok, that's a lie. It's the protocol itself. Security concerns. Length restrictions. Still, I'm the last one to urge one to introduce breaking changes as long as it works for your environment and meets your requirements.
This issue has been migrated from Redmine: https://dev.icinga.com/issues/13973
Created by tobiasvdk on 2017-01-12 15:24:23 +00:00
Assignee: (none)
Status: Rejected (closed on 2017-01-13 08:04:52 +00:00)
Target Version: (none)
Last Update: 2017-01-13 08:04:52 +00:00 (in Redmine)
Mandatory fields, for a service, should be optional in the template and only mandatory in the resulting object. Otherwise you can't modify the service template anymore without assign a maybe stupid default.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: