Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[dev.icinga.com #13253] Allow to show fields based on other field values #613

Closed
icinga-migration opened this issue Nov 18, 2016 · 4 comments
Milestone

Comments

@icinga-migration
Copy link

This issue has been migrated from Redmine: https://dev.icinga.com/issues/13253

Created by tgelf on 2016-11-18 15:51:20 +00:00

Assignee: tgelf
Status: Resolved (closed on 2016-12-14 16:50:03 +00:00)
Target Version: 1.3.0
Last Update: 2016-12-14 16:50:03 +00:00 (in Redmine)


This will allow one to build wizard-style forms, like showing all the fields for SNMPv3 only when the corresponding protocol has been chosen from another related drop-down field.

Changesets

2016-12-14 16:33:13 +00:00 by tgelf 7e7e260

ObjectFields: prefix filters, respect inheritance

refs #13253

2016-12-14 16:41:15 +00:00 by tgelf 4f8f795

schema: provide migration for conditional fields

fixes #13253
@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by tobiasvdk on 2016-12-08 13:54:41 +00:00

Will the use case to filter the host template list based on the hostname or already applied templates be considered?

My use case:
We have different types of hosts, e.g. compute node, storage node ..., which can be recognized by a naming schema. So for storage nodes I only want to make "some" host templates available that can be choosen.

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by tgelf on 2016-12-08 14:09:27 +00:00

tobiasvdk wrote:

Will the use case to filter the host template list based on the hostname or already applied templates be considered?

Not here, but that's what I had in mind once I created #12974. With those two combined (and future complex data types) one should be able to easily create pretty complex, opinionated configuration wizards.

In case you have some related ideas, wishes or thoughts it would be great if you could leave them in the linked issue. This one is for custom fields "only".

Cheers,
Thomas

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by tgelf on 2016-12-14 16:34:40 +00:00

  • Status changed from New to Assigned
  • Assigned to set to tgelf
  • Target Version set to 1.3.0

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by tgelf on 2016-12-14 16:50:03 +00:00

  • Status changed from Assigned to Resolved
  • Done % changed from 0 to 100

Applied in changeset 4f8f795.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant