Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[dev.icinga.com #12981] Cryptographically signed audit log #521

Open
icinga-migration opened this issue Oct 25, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

[dev.icinga.com #12981] Cryptographically signed audit log #521

icinga-migration opened this issue Oct 25, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@icinga-migration
Copy link

This issue has been migrated from Redmine: https://dev.icinga.com/issues/12981

Created by twidhalm on 2016-10-25 12:01:02 +00:00

Assignee: (none)
Status: New
Target Version: Feature whishlist
Last Update: 2016-12-13 09:45:36 +00:00 (in Redmine)


Hi,

Since I have lots of customers who want a revision-ready audit log, I think it would be a good idea to have a signature on every config change. So the database based audit log (and maybe the yet-to-come audit log from #12976 ) could use signature with the GnuPG key of the person who issued the change.

I don't know how keeping the passphrase could work so that it's safe but not so complicated that users won't use it.

Cheers,
Thomas

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by mfrosch on 2016-10-26 17:25:50 +00:00

  • Priority changed from Normal to Low

The audit log itself is checksummed, and basically verifiable.

If you really secure the database it should be fine.

But still, this is a low prio issue, and needs a concept, and proper implementation.

So open for discussion.

@icinga-migration
Copy link
Author

Updated by tgelf on 2016-12-13 09:45:36 +00:00

  • Priority changed from Low to Normal
  • Target Version set to Feature whishlist

@icinga-migration icinga-migration added this to the Feature whishlist milestone Jan 17, 2017
@Thomas-Gelf Thomas-Gelf removed this from the Feature whishlist milestone Oct 23, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants